Home   |   Members only   |   Contact   

Site menu:

Latest news

2013.08.31
Official end of project

Press release on concluding public workshop

See documents »

Presentations and photo's from concluding workshop

Public workshop »

Updated movie of autonomous tractor

See movies »

Location: Lecopro.org / About 

About

LeCoPro: Description - Work program (WP 1 - WP 2 - WP 3 - WP 4 - WP 5)

Description

Advanced control methods, which significantly enhance the efficiency of production machines, are of vital importance for the Flemish machine construction industry to preserve their leading position within the world economy. New control methods are necessary to satisfy the growing customer demands regarding both flexibility and productivity. Traditional controllers in production machines have important limitations. Firstly, in many cases it is intricate or even impossible for the designers and operators to optimally tune the parameters of a traditional production machine controller due to the complex nature and the vaguely known dynamics of these machines. Furthermore, traditional control algorithms are not able to track changing system parameters and varying environmental conditions, which often appear in practical situations, and will consequently not adapt the control parameters accordingly. These drawbacks of traditional control algorithms, which result in suboptimal efficiency of the controlled machines, can be solved by the introduction of learning behaviour in machine controllers. This will allow machines to automatically learn the optimal control parameters and adapt to variations in both process parameters and environmental conditions.

The realization of such ‘intelligent machines’ was the long-term goal of the LeCoPro project. The project has made a first step in this direction by creating a knowledge platform in Flanders on learning control strategies for production machines. As Flanders has already a lot of expertise on learning techniques, but on different applications, the basic elements for the creation of such knowledge platform were already available at the start. The more concrete objective of the project were therefore to provide the Flemish machine builders with practical methodologies for the design of learning controllers for their production machines. To achieve this objective, two related research tracks were acknowledged: (i) learning control methodologies for complex (sub)systems and (ii) learning control methodologies for decentralized systems.

Top

Work program

Three key features of a mechatronic system play an important role in the selection of the learning control strategy:


Fig. 1: 3D-classification of mechatronic systems


Fig. 1 shows a 3D-classification of mechatronic systems, based on these features. The work program of LeCoPro is set up according to this classification. While the research in WP 1 focused on the learning control of an individual mechatronic subsystem, the goal of WP 2 was to develop learning controllers for a global system, consisting of multiple subsystems. Finally, in WP 3, the goal was to practically validate the results of WP 1 and WP 2 and to integrate these results in a combined controller, where on the one hand advanced controllers are applied on the subsystem level and on the other hand a global controller guarantees an optimal global performance.

Top

WP 1: Learning control for individual subsystems

The goal of WP 1 was the development of model-based as well as non-model-based learning controllers for individual mechatronic subsystems. For these subsystems, nowadays two model-based learning control strategies are mainly applied: Iterative Learning Control (ILC) and Model Predictive Control (MPC). Although the first implementations of learning control strategies appear in the controllers of subsystems in practical machines, there are still many challenges, which require further research, to increase the applicability of these algorithms to a broader range of mechatronic applications. Therefore, the extension of the existing model-based strategies (ILC and MPC) as well as the application of non-model based machine learning techniques (Evolution-based Machine Learning and Reinforcement Learning (RL)) on mechatronic subsystems was the subject of WP 1 (Fig. 2).


Fig. 2: The objective of WP 1


Top

WP 2: Learning control for global mechatronic systems, consisting of interacting subsystems

In most of the current mechatronic applications with multiple subsystems, a controller is developed for each subsystem. However, the interactions between these different individual controllers are not taken into account in the controller design. Such a strategy often leads to a suboptimal global performance of the control system, especially for strongly interacting subsystems. Therefore, the goal of this WP was to evaluate the possibilities of global learning controllers for interconnected subsystems, which try to coordinate the local control actions such that a global optimum is obtained. This principle is illustrated in Fig. 3.


Fig. 3: The objective of WP 2


Similar to WP1, model-based as well as non-model-based control techniques were be investigated in this WP. Distributed MPC is a model-based technique, which was explored in this framework, while Evolution-based Machine Learning and RL are the two non-model-based techniques. The objective of this WP was twofold:

Top

WP 3: Integration and validation of learning controllers on practical test cases

In this WP, the results of WP 1 and WP 2 have been combined into an integrated controller and practically validated. For the integration into a combined controller the main focus was on the more complicated interaction between the global learning controller and the decentralised learning controllers for the subsystems. For the practical validation of the different learning control techniques, the objective was to select some representative development cases. On these cases, learning controllers were developed for the subsystems as well as for the global machine. The performance of these learning controllers was compared with the performance of current machine controllers to check the strengths and weaknesses of the different learning controllers.


Fig. 4: The objective of WP 3


Top

WP 4: Dissemination

The main objective of this WP was the dissemination of the project results to the user group and interest group, which is the first audience, as well as to other interested parties. In this way, the collaboration between companies and research institutions of Flanders is stimulated.

Top

WP 5: Coordination and project management

The objective of this WP was to ensure a smooth running of the project.

Top